How does LINQ impact scalability of pagination strategies in distributed databases?
Updated May 16, 2026
Short answer
LINQ pagination using Skip/Take becomes inefficient at scale due to database scanning overhead.
Deep explanation
In distributed or sharded databases, Skip requires scanning and discarding rows before returning results. As offsets grow, performance degrades. LINQ translates Skip/Take into SQL OFFSET/FETCH, which is inefficient for large datasets. Keyset pagination (using last seen ID or timestamp) is more scalable but requires manual query design.
Unlock with a Pro subscription to view this section.
View pricingReal-world example
No real-world example available yet.
Unlock with a Pro subscription to view this section.
Upgrade to ProCommon mistakes
No common mistakes listed yet.
Unlock with a Pro subscription to view this section.
Upgrade to ProFollow-up questions
No follow-up questions available yet.
Unlock with a Pro subscription to view this section.
Upgrade to Pro